Publication Ethics

The PREMIERE journal is managed by the PGMI Program Study, Faculty of Tarbiyah, Nahdlatul Ulama Islamic Institute of Tuban. Publications in this journal have several codes of ethics which are provisions for all parties involved in the PREMIERE journal publication process, namely the journal manager, editor, reviewer, and author.

The Publication Code of Ethics basically upholds three ethical values in publication, namely Neutrality, which is not taking sides with any party and free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications; Justice, namely giving authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors; and Honesty, which is free from duplication, falsification of data, and plagiarism in publications.

Responsibility of Journal Manager

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scientific scope, periodicity, and accreditation if needed;
  2. Determine the membership of the editorial board;
  3. Define the relationship between publishers, editors, reviewers, and other parties in a contract;
  4. Respect confidential matters, both for contributing researchers, authors , editors, and reviewers;
  5. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright;
  6. Review journal policies and submit them to authors, editors, reviewers, and readers;
  7. Create code of conduct guidelines for editors and reviewers;
  8. Publish journals regularly;
  9. Ensuring the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publishing;
  10. Building a network of cooperation and marketing; and
  11. Prepare permits and other legal aspects.

Editor Responsibility

  1. Meeting the needs of readers and writers;
  2. Strive to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis;
  3. Implement processes to ensure the quality of published papers;
  4. Prioritize freedom of opinion objectively;
  5. Maintain the integrity of the author's academic track record;
  6. Submit corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies when necessary;
  7. Responsible for the style and format of the work writing, while the contents and all statements in the written work are the responsibility of the author;
  8. Actively solicit the opinions of authors, readers, reviewers, and members of the editorial board to improve the quality of publications;
  9. Encouraging an assessment of the journal if there are findings;
  10. Supporting initiatives to reduce research errors and publications by asking authors to attach an ethical clearance form that has been approved by the ethical clearance commission;
  11. Support initiatives to educate researchers about publication ethics;
  12. Review the effects of publication policies on the attitudes of authors and reviewers and improve them to increase accountability take responsibility and minimize errors;
  13. have an open mind to new opinions or the views of others that may conflict with personal opinions; and
  14. Encouraging writers to improve their written work so that it is worthy of publication.

Reviewers Responsibility

  1. Received an assignment from the editor to review the written work and submit the study to the editor as a material for determining the feasibility of a written work to be published;
  2. Not reviewing written works involving himself, either directly or indirectly;
  3. Maintaining the confidentiality of the author by not disseminating the results of corrections, suggestions, and recommendations on the manuscripts they have reviewed;
  4. Encouraging authors to improve their manuscripts;
  5. Reviewing written works that have been corrected in accordance with predetermined standards; and
  6. Reviewing manuscripts in a timely manner according to the style of the journal environment and based on scientific principles (data collection methods, author's legality, drawing conclusions, etc.).

Author Responsibility

  1. Ensuring that those included in the list of authors meet the criteria as authors;
  2. Collectively responsible for the work and content of manuscripts/articles which include methods, analysis, calculations, and details;
  3. State the origin of resources (including funding), either directly or indirectly;
  4. Explain the limitations of the research;
  5. Respond to comments made by reviewers in a professional and timely manner;
  6. Inform the editor if he will withdraw his written work; and
  7. Make a statement that the paper submitted for publication is original, has not been published anywhere in any language, and is not in the process of being submitted to another publisher.